Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 52(6): 2061-8, 2008 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18362191

RESUMO

Staphylococcus saprophyticus is a uropathogenic bacterium that causes acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections, particularly in female outpatients. We investigated the dissemination and antimicrobial susceptibilities of 101 S. saprophyticus isolates from the genitourinary tracts of patients in Japan. Eight of these isolates were mecA positive and showed beta-lactam resistance. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis showed that only some isolates were isogenic, indicating that the mecA gene was apparently acquired independently by mecA-positive isolates through staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). Type determination of SCCmec by multiplex PCR showed a nontypeable element in the eight mecA-positive isolates. Sequence analysis of the entire SCCmec element from a prototype S. saprophyticus strain revealed that it was nontypeable with the current SCCmec classification due to the novel composition of the class A mec gene complex (IS431-mecA-mecR1-mecI genes) and the ccrA1/ccrB3 gene complex. Intriguingly, the attachment sites of SCCmec are similar to those of type I SCCmec in S. aureus NCTC 10442. Furthermore, the genes around the mec gene complex are similar to those of type II/III SCCmec in S. aureus, while those around the ccr gene complex are similar to those of SCC15305RM found in S. saprophyticus ATCC 15305. In comparison with known SCCmec elements, this S. saprophyticus SCCmec is a novel type.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Cromossomos Bacterianos/genética , Resistência a Meticilina , Staphylococcus/classificação , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Eletroforese em Gel de Campo Pulsado , Resistência a Meticilina/genética , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus/genética
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 27(6): 500-4, 2006 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16697558

RESUMO

In order to validate the current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria for the detection of mecA-mediated resistance in Staphylococcus saprophyticus, 101 clinical isolates, including 8 mecA-positive isolates, were investigated. All the isolates were in the range of the resistant category for coagulase-negative staphylococci with the 1 microg oxacillin disk diffusion method and agar dilution method, despite 93 isolates (92%) being mecA-negative. On the other hand, the 30 microg cefoxitin disk diffusion method showed clearly distinguishable zone diameters between the mecA-positive and -negative isolates. However, four of the mecA-negative isolates that would be considered resistant were false positive, and the current interpretive criteria of the CLSI may thus require reconsideration. This study suggests that the cefoxitin disk diffusion method could be more suitable than the oxacillin disk diffusion method for detecting mecA-mediated resistance in S. saprophyticus.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/fisiologia , Cefoxitina/farmacologia , Resistência a Meticilina , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Proteínas de Bactérias/análise , Humanos , Proteínas de Ligação às Penicilinas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...